The aortic paradox: a nationwide analysis of 523 994 individual echocardiograms exploring fatal aortic dissection

Paratz, Elizabeth D and Nadel, James and Humphries, Julie and Rowe, Stephanie and Fahy, Louise and La Gerche, Andre and Prior, David and Celermajer, David and Strange, Geoffrey and Playford, David (2024) The aortic paradox: a nationwide analysis of 523 994 individual echocardiograms exploring fatal aortic dissection. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, 25 (10). pp.1423-1431. ISSN 2047-2404

Full text not available from this repository.
Link to published document: http://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeae140

Abstract

AIMS: Increasing aortic dilation increases the risk of aortic dissection. Nevertheless, dissection occurs at dimensions below guideline-directed cut-offs for prophylactic surgery. Currently, there are no large-scale population imaging data assessing aortic dimensions before dissection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients within the National Echo Database of Australia were stratified according to absolute, height-indexed, and body surface area (BSA)-indexed aortic dimensions. Fatal thoracic aortic dissections (ICD-10-AM Code I71) were identified via linkage with the National Death Index. A total of 524 994 individuals were assessed, comprising patients with normal aortic dimensions (n = 460 992), mild dilation (n = 53 402), moderate dilation (n = 10 029), and severe dilation (n = 572). A total of 274 992 (52.4%) were males, with a median age of 64 years and a median follow-up time of 6.9 years. Eight hundred and ninety-nine fatal aortic dissections occurred (normal diameter = 610, mildly dilated aorta = 215, moderately dilated = 53, and severely dilated = 21). Using normal aortas as the reference population, odds of fatal dissection increased with aortic diameter [mild = odds ratio (OR) 3.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.61-3.56; moderate = OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.02-5.30; severe = OR 28.72, 95% CI 18.44-44.72]. Due to the much larger number of patients without severe aortic dilation, 97.7% of fatal aortic dissections occurred in non-severely dilated aortas. Following sensitivity analysis, severe aortic dilation was responsible for at most 24.4% of fatal aortic dissections. The results were robust for absolute, height-indexed, or BSA-indexed aortic measurements. CONCLUSION: Although severe aortic dilatation is associated with a near-30-fold increase in fatal dissections, severely dilated aortas are implicated in only 2.3-24.4% of fatal dissections. This highlights the 'aortic paradox' and limitations of current guidelines. Future studies should seek to refine risk predictors in patients without severe aortic dilation.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Depositing User: Repository Administrator
Date Deposited: 01 Jan 2025 23:48
Last Modified: 01 Jan 2025 23:48
URI: https://eprints.victorchang.edu.au/id/eprint/1614

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item